Large Scale Central

Polk's GeneratioNeXt

David Russell said:

I appreciate your knowledge however you guys need to get over your hang up’s and personal vendettas. You use cars as a reference, pick up the phone and call Saturn or Saab and ask them about support for their products? Good luck with your old Jaguars and their support is that good for your hobby?

I joined this site and stayed “TRUE” to this site because we all shared an interest in playing with model trains outdoors. Not how well they were built, not if they ran like crap but we were playing with model trains and enjoying them. Way I see it is “simple” and enjoying/sharing a hobby on the only model train site I’m on !

So, when there are no comments pertaining to “personal vendettas” in this thread that I have read, do you bring it up?

This isn’t about that, but the comment is very typical of the old way of derailing any conversation (your) favorite manufacturer doesn’t like. Been going on for years and years. You’re just following true to form. Like shouting “racist!” when no such thing occurred, but suddenly everybody thinks it must have happened. Just saying “personal vendetta” and folks who can’t be bothered to read 11 pages to see will just believe it.

Oh…and I have less trouble finding parts for my Jag than you would imagine.

I have better luck on parts for my 65 year old Fords than some newer cars. If I get a headlight broken, it’s a headlight…not half the front end and $700 each IF you can find them. Sort of like the Ames Super Socket for the K-27. No Longer Available.

Dave - Do you really need to keep the war between you and Stan going here? You are the only one I’ve ever seen use that name for the socket.

That is the semi-official name, and actually heard it used by Bachmann reps. Who is responsible for it?

If you want to engage in revisionist history and call it something else…go ahead.

The full official name is “Ames Super Socket With Integrated Production Electronics”. Call it what you want. Call it a different protocol than the sockets that came after. Call it inverted chuff signal. Call it ROHS compliant solder but not ROHS compliant PC, and effectively non-repairable.

The name is the name it was given when first released.

You want to call it a war? Go ahead. Doesn’t bother me. I just calls 'em as I sees 'em.

TOC

I clearly recall it being called “super socket” by just about everyone in all the discussions about it. It wasn’t that long ago. I just call it what I call all DCC circuit boards, sound boards, electronic gobbledygook that I didn’t ask for yet am now expected to pay twice the price for whether I want it or not… useless.

Vic the Luddite (http://www.largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif)

Vic, yea. But is value added to the product. (http://largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif)

Only if you actually want it. (http://largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-undecided.gif)And I don’t. (http://largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-frown.gif)

David Maynard said:

Vic, yea. But is value added to the product. (http://largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-wink.gif)

Only if you actually want it. (http://largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-undecided.gif)And I don’t. (http://largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-frown.gif)

I don’t understand how some of the LS market thinking is out there. If it were about cars, it would be like wanting to buy a new car only to find that you can only buy it fully loaded with all the luxury options and automatic transmission that jacks the price up 2x what’s the list base price, and all you wanted was a manual transmission a radio and AC. But the dealer tells you NO its everything or take a walk…can you imagine how bad that would be for sales? That’s a primary reason I’ve stopped considering buying alot of things I’d like.

I understand the idea, make it easy to add a decoder. That part is great.

If you don’t want a decoder, Aristo supplied a “shorting plug”. That made it easy for track power.

But if you want to install something that does not plug into the socket, then it’s a pain. Adding screw terminals would solve the problem technologically, but add cost. That would make installs easier, but raise the price a bit. It should add very little to the cost, and it probably does, but the manufacturers seemed to add too much to the purchase price.

It should only add a buck or two… and it would be be easier that a full rewire.

Vic, you don’t like the socket, or the added cost of a stock decoder?

greg

Oh, Bachmann, it does not take a circuit board the size of Texas to do this.

Greg, but we, the end consumer, have to pay for the socket, the MTS, the so so sound, or whatever the manufacturer in question decided to add. They decided what we want. I want a locomotive that runs, and runs reliably. Thats it. When/if I want to add sound, RC or whatever, I can do that if the thing is just bare bones inside. But heck no, there are boards and wires and gizmos and…I paid for all this crap.

The socket costs nothing in relation to the cost of the loco, re-read my post, I am not espousing standard decoders.

The socket in of itself is not evil, and only a small percentage really don’t like it, that being battery guys, and if it was done intelligently (re-read my last line) it would not be a negative to almost everyone (no way I can make TOC happy ha ha!).

Greg

Why not offer two versions; one with the special board, and one without… LGB did that for a while with the non MTS equipped locos. Yes it adds another step in the production line, but it gives the customer a choice. Then after selling x number of units you could make a market choice to drop one line, or continue.
Back the regularly scheduled discussion…

Too expensive nowadays to have 2 versions… if the board adds no cost to the loco, and it is not the size of texas what is the issue?

Greg

Greg Elmassian said:

Too expensive nowadays to have 2 versions… if the board adds no cost to the loco, and it is not the size of texas what is the issue?

Greg

The ability to solder, or add wires? Aka screw terminals. Saying it adds no cost to the loco seems like a misnomer as some one has to pay for the cost of the board. Say it costs $1 to make. Does the manufacturer (kader), seller (aristo, usat, LGB, bachm), buyer 1 (dealers), or buyer 2 (hobbyists) absorb this cost? In your case your saying that either the 1st or the 2nd player will be willing to absorb the cost without passing it on.

No Greg I don’t like the boards, DCC, sound, etc… reason being that even though its doesn’t cost much to add in production, that doesn’t stop them from jacking up the price. Example Piko 2-6-0, non sound version is around $150, add the sound jacks it up to about $300. LGBs Porter non DCC board $75, added $150, these are street prices, MSRPs are much higher. We all KNOW the costs of electronics is peanuts, but it still happens the prices go way up whenever the MFRs add the electronic bells and whistles. If you are using straight DC track power, no sound, simple set up, your punished financially, same for the battery guys, the proprietary electronics are almost a deliberate attempt by the manufacturer to force use of their proprietary control systems. MTH for example. LGB tried that with MTS as well.

I like the sockets. Always have.

Well, Aristo screwed up a couple that I can think of. Of course Bachmann got the K27 chuff signal “a…e about face” but even that has an easy fix.

There are adaptor pcb’s available with screw terminals that plug into the sockets so that non PnP ESC’s can be used. The adaptors also provide polarised and filtered linear DC so that non PnP ESC’s can actually run on a constant track voltage of any type, including DCC.

Bachmann seems to have learned their lesson after the K27 and not only are the sockets in subsequent Spectrum locos A-OK but the mechanisms are light years ahead of what they used to be. The C19 is superb.

Sure the prices are higher than they were and yes that certainly impacts on part of the market place. However you only get what you pay for in this World.

If you want to pay peanuts you will get crap. It is the top end of the market that will be able to continue spending on their hobbies. You can’t blame Bachmann for going after that top end segment.

There’s been some discussion about this over on MLS as well, let me clarify my position about costs and quality by reposting a reply from over there, its a bit repetitive as some of this has already been discussed here:

Theres been ALOT of discussion about this on the other site, it boils down to the most likely scenario:
>Kader (99.9% probability) OWNS the tooling for ALL of Aristo products (possibly USAt btw)
>Scott retains ownership of the rights to market Aristo named products.
This is a standard business practice for chinese mfr. the mfr owns the means of production, the client pays for the name and marketing for those specificly tooled and labeled products.
>Kader will by all appearances, NOT take any new orders for Aristo labeled products, until all of the products Kader produced for Lewis has been paid for.
>Kader also just bumped the starting price for new product 40%, that ACROSS THE BOARD and affects EVERY company that was relying on Kader to produce for their products (read USAt).
> Bachmann, being owned by Kader, should not effected by this bump, but it remains to be seen if Kader also raises prices on its own products as well.

Basically the days of cheap trains from China are GONE! When Bachmann’s street price for the C19 is $800, for an engine that’s NOT that much different than the Connie which was $250 street, (LSC edit: yes, the C19 is vastly better drive wise, I wanted an example of how expensive plastic engines were becoming) that’s not the way to grow the hobby. In regards to Aristo, the 0-4-0/caboose set price, from Scott’s site, is $320, add Kader’s new increase brings it to $460.00 add shipping and taxes that’s close enough as makes no difference to $500!
$500 bucks for a starter engine? LGB isn’t any better, their basic Porter MSRP is $350, for an starter set engine I once paid only $75 for. The ONLY difference being the electronics boards that IMHO have done nothing but drive prices up to unreasonable levels.

Sorry folks but at those prices alone, I dont see much of a broad future for Aristo, GeneratioNext, USA or Bachmann if Bmann also bumps prices accordingly. If large scale continues its going to be MUCH more like the days when LGB was the only game in town, by that I mean, EXCLUSIVE. not a broad hobby, but a specialized limited hobby for those who can afford the high price of trains, track and support.

Maybe in the long run, that’s the ONLY way large scale will survive. Because maybe the ONLY way we are going to get rugged reliable outdoor quality trains who’s wheels don’t fall off like my goddam Aristo 0-4-0 did, is to pay threw the nose. But that goes back to the manufacturers, IF they produce rugged LGB quality products then paying top dollar may not be a bad thing, but if they keep making the same cheap questionable quality product that breaks or has QC problems out of the box like we’ve been plagued with for over a decade, something AC & Bmann have been notorious for, yet still claim the higher pricing we are seeing today, then the gauge is doomed to retract to a couple brands that people will trust, because people will NOT pay top dollar for problem plagued product.
All this is just my personal observations

Back to LSC, my point is that I fully understand costs are up and will stay up, and that it costs less to load the stuff with the electronics as its only one assembly line vs two, and that for the majority of buyers they want the electrics. I’m clearly in the minority these days. As a result I’m also probably priced out of the 90% of the new market and will have to trawl Ebay for most of my stuff from here on out, that’s something I’ve resigned myself to.

The questions to me are:

Will quality also now get a bump up? The latest Annie and the C19 bode well for Kader/Bachmann.

Will USAt be priced out of any new production runs, is this intentional on Kader’s part?

Will Scott ever be able to sell off all of Aristo’s old stock, and even if so, will Kader honor any new orders?

Does Kader already have something else up its sleeve and has had since Aristo’s demise?

The Chinese may openly scoff at us for “playing with toys” but they also like the smell of our money and will continue to produce model trains (in all scales) for the American market, they are way too entrenched financially in the smaller scales to do otherwise. They can see that even in large scale there is money to be made in the US market and they are not stupid enough to walk away from it (well…we’ll see) but the business model has changed dramatically.

The questions to me are:

  1. Will quality also now get a bump up? The latest Annie and the C19 bode well for Kader/Bachmann.

  2. Will USAt be priced out of any new production runs, is this intentional on Kader’s part?

  3. Will Scott ever be able to sell off all of Aristo’s old stock, and even if so, will Kader honor any new orders?

  4. Does Kader already have something else up its sleeve and has had since Aristo’s demise?

  5. I don’t the quality vs. price vs. quality control issue will change radically overnight, but it seems to be that Bachmann has been able to have Kader improve their product.

  6. Since there are only two 1:29 vendors now, I figure USAT will get a price hike, but still be competitive to AML.

  7. We have no hard data on “what is left on the docks” that Kader is using to “hold hostage” for anyone that wants “Aristo” products. It’s clear to me that not even the people buying these (Scott and his partner) knew this.

  8. I think Kader makes enough other stuff that this is not high on their priority list. It does not seem that “holding the molds” gives a sense of urgency to Kader to do something with them. They seem to be operating near capacity, so that would make sense.

Greg

We can all be happy that trains were affordable in the past but this is changing quickly.

first ALL small businesses abhor dealing with the Chinese. There are many hoops one must jump through. Not only Chinese, but US import and trade laws. The cost of American labor is so high that small run nitche market items would be priced well out of the price range for most consumers. Thus, we see many if not most of these small companies are forced to out source manufacturing to the Pacific Rim.

What is now happening in these counrties is cheap labor and raw materials(plastic) are becoming a thing of the past. This coupled with pressure from the west to equalize currency is driving the manufacturing cost up. Kader (along with many other manfacturing firms) is passing cost along. They only make money if they have a market to sell their products to, whether directly or through secondary sellers!!

According to a discussion with Lewis a few years ago, Kader owns the molds. Again US labor costs were such that he was forced to only send semi detailed drawings and specs of the products to Kader. Their model shops built the ‘mothers’ and final molds at Kaders cost. For this Lewis had to have a large minimum order to offset these cost. This was further substancuated by Charlie. We had a discussion about USAT selling heavyweights. Apparently, Kader approached him about using the molds from Aristro with a roof design change. It became a non issue when Kader wanted a minmum of 250 units for each of the six models. This was an expenditure he felt with the soft market would take 5-6 yrs to recover his up front costs.

Again, to keep the costs within the preceived costs hobbiest were willing to pay, compromises were required. Sometimes it was modifications to protype design for cheaper tooling. Sometimes it was on quality specs. There Lewis and Charlie depended upon their consultants. Unfortunately, when the ‘guess’ was to low, the customer saw it quickly as years of quality testing was not done. Remember these are small family businesses with limited resources.

Lewis claims to have paid Kader for all product he ordered. He claims when he order a thousand of any item, they would run an extra 5-10% in case if defects or reorder. These over runs are what Scott is purchasing.

Scotts did not have any realistic business plan. He was out of work and despirate for any income. Lewis supplied him with a short term job liquidating inventory. Scott and Lewis had differences when he would not bankroll Scott for the new business. Scott has hit up some of my friends for funding, but is too risky. I doubt he will continue if he hasn’t already stopped as according the Maryann, he now has a full time job at a ‘major firm’ requiring a substancial amount of his time.

As Greg noted earlier, some type of circuit board is required to tie even the most fundamental wiring together. The cost of putting a socket on the board is pennies. Not all of us are electrical engineers and are comfortable with a soldering iron. We want the manufacturers to use the KISS principle for us so our time may be spent running trains. This is especially true of the ‘newbie’, whom we want/need to keep the hobby alive and well.

"1. Will quality also now get a bump up? The latest Annie and the C19 bode well for Kader/Bachmann.

  1. Will USAt be priced out of any new production runs, is this intentional on Kader’s part?

  2. Will Scott ever be able to sell off all of Aristo’s old stock, and even if so, will Kader honor any new orders?

  3. Does Kader already have something else up its sleeve and has had since Aristo’s demise?"

The answer to these, and other pressing question, will be revealed in the next episode. Same Bat Time, Same Bat Cahnnel

Sorry, I couldn’t help myself.

I do have to agree that Bachmann’s quality has improved over the years. I have 2 Bachmann HO 2-6-0 that I run pretty much non stop at shows. They are great little locomotives. The Large Scale 10 wheelers also have improved quite a bit over the years, and Bachmann got the hint, and sells their new large scale products with metal wheels. It’s a shame USA and Aristo never really got that hint.

As thomas said, the cost of manufacturing in China has gone up. The workers are moving from lower class to middle class now, and they realize what their labor is worth. Add to that all the other things thomas said and I have to wonder if some manufacturing is going to eventually come back to the states.

If Kader is running near capacity, then yes, large scale isn’t a big concern for them now.

The complaint some of us consumers have with the electronics, is that in the end we do have to pay a lot more for most of it. Maybe it cost a few dollars to put that sound, or decoder, into the locomotive for us at manufacture, but the sticker price goes way up because it now comes with such and such already installed. As an example, and it was stated before by Vic, is the LGB porter. I overbought them when they were like $75 each. Now they are around $200 each with this stuff already installed for me. Stuff I do not want.

Back to the main topic though. Thomas does explain what I had suspected, that Scott didn’t have a well researched and thought out business plan. If I were to take on a line like the old Aristo, I would want to know, up front, what I would have to do to get what I want and to do what I want. And if that means buying NOS, I would want to know what, how much, and at what cost.

I have to agree with both Vic and Dave when it comes to adding DCC, sound or other substancial upgrades. Keep it at a minimum to keep it affordable and let the end user upgrade as he desires or can afford. BUT, the addition of a universal socket board (or well documented screw terminals) so the end user has a ‘drop in’ to make upgrading for the electronically challanged feasible. This creates an aftermarket for both the manufacturer and third party products. Those who have the capability to add base level upgrades would have no trouble bypassing the socket boards.

I also doubt Kader is running at capacity as they have an unending supply of labor. They are not stupid. In a soft market, they will not abandon their established marketing chain. Establishing their own product line could take years.

…and where is the market for any product these days…at least a market that would assure any manufacturer that a run of several thousand, or even a single thousand, would sell within a year. And what product with added “Gizmos” could any two people agree on …

Can anyone, subscribing to this thread, show where, and if such a market exists TODAY ?

Fred Mills