Large Scale Central

Oh, my

Parkdesigner said:
Ha!

(ok - where do the smiles come from around here?)


Well, it depends on whether you’re standing in front of someone, or behind, typically.

That said,

Welcome to the “active” side of LSC, and thank you for the heads up about the domes. I was looking through the new parts list with similar ideas of kitbashing in mind, and would have likely made the same mistake – you’ve probably saved me an expensive lesson. I suspect parts now from Philladelpha will be somewhat like parts before … only with more and varied parts, and a web interface to place the order, which experience teaches us means: Be prepared to be VERY specific about what you need, and even then don’t count on getting what you wanted. Shame, that.

As to the rest of it… you will find here, like any other forum, that a high “Squelch” setting, and perhaps a pair of Peril Sensitive Sunglasses will help a great deal.

And, for the rest of the community reading this:

I’ve seen Josh post in other forums for some time now, and I’m surprised there’s a contingent here who have never heard of him under one name or the other … he’s the kind of skilled modeler and has a background in prototype knowledge that would make him a valueable asset in both the model making and prototype research department. His intensity, dare we say, “enthusiasm” for high quality and high fidelity in modeling combined with an unusually colorful vocabulary might occasionally put off the uninitiated … but how many more of us found here would fit that bill?

Then again, Josh, I’m not sure my endorsement will get you many votes. I think I’m friends with all the wrong people too. But, as Ben Franklin said "“We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.” Here you can have all the noose that’s fit to print.

Matthew (OV) <— Also not the name that appears on my birth certificate, but everyone knows who it means.

Matthew (OV) said:
I've seen Josh post in other forums for some time now, and I'm surprised there's a contingent here who have never heard of him under one name or the other .... he's the kind of skilled modeler and has a background in prototype knowledge that would make him a valueable asset in both the model making and prototype research department. His intensity, dare we say, "enthusiasm" for high quality and high fidelity in modeling combined with an unusually colorful vocabulary might occasionally put off the uninitiated ... but how many more of us found here would fit that bill?
Me.....if he plays with modern prototype? ;)

Going too bed…

Tony,

True, but then again, when repeating the facts, it just seems to upset some… some people will always fight, rather than just move on (that sure ain’t me, since I’m the ONLY one here to apologize, even though I’m the one that got sucker punched out of left field to start all this…)

I’m leaving the Bachmann thing alone now - as I said before - I wanted to warn people - I’m sure, regardless of the rest, people now know.

Not to mention - if you continue, it appears that David, who already “went out to go build something” will come back in, only so he can make a point of leaving… again.

I know you’re only trying to help - but I’ve already said my piece… I got suckered into schoolyard bullying tactics and shame on me… it’s always the second guy that throws the punch to get caught, not the first… heck, the first doesn’t even have to say “I’m sorry”… I should have known better… of course, I’m still getting used to the rules - seems the actions of the schoolyard are fair game, but not the language… still trying to figure out how on an adult forum, about an adult hobby, frequented by adults… that language found on the Disney Channel’s programming is unacceptable…

Josh

Oh wait - I forgot the :wink:

Matt,

Fancy meeting you over here! Thanks for the kind words… I’m off to see what modeling efforts I can dig up to post… seems that may be the only true way forward out of this… That, and early bed time… trainshow tomorrow ya know!!

Josh

Josh Welcome to LSC.

I’m sure Brian did not mean any harm and I fully understand your being upset. Glade to see we seem to be moving on.

Side note to everyone. This is the only train forum I post on and deal with. It may not be the best one but its the best one for me.

Hope you all had a great new year.

Geoff :slight_smile:

Yep!!!
You would not believe the amount of modelling now proudly taking place openly (compared to what it was earlier) since all the nastiness of politics and religion got banned last year.

TonyWalsham said:
Yep!!! You would not believe the amount of modelling now proudly taking place openly (compared to what it was earlier) since all the nastiness of politics and religion got banned last year.
Tony, you ain't seen nothing yet! :lol:

BTW at present I’m reading Dawkins’ “The GOD delusion”; quite entertaining in a snickering kind of way. :wink: :slight_smile:

Now Now!! HJ.

Taboo subject. Remember.

Glad to hear the pixxing match is about over as it isn’t very productive.

Seems like mentioning B-mann, Aristo or LGB turns someone’s crank the wrong direction every once in awhile.

Nice to have a heads up when problems arise so we can make the right choice with the $$.

Oh ya ! Josh, Welcome to the not strictly regulated or censored website.

TOF in Lost Wages

I go and spend a few hours with the family at a holiday get together and come back to a five page thread. Oy vey!
I could go on with a lengthy explanation of what happened here but let’s just let the napping dogs lie.

Hippo Gnu Deer everyone!

-Brian

Shawn said:
Happy New Year thats why I dont trust Bachmann. .
At least Bmann is offering parts, in some form.

I read recently that Athearn (big time HO ) was going to discontinue offering any repair or replacement parts whatsoever, so basicly they (Athern) are saying""… if you break that year old $200 loco, we aint going to sell you the parts to fix it - so suck it up chubby and go buy another one…suckers."

Its not going over well in HO circles, it will be interesting to see how long this policy actually lasts in the face of long time customer wrath.

deleted

Well gents, here we go again…

Posted on the Bachmann forum:

"rrcycle wrote:

Re: Large Scale Parts
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2010, 05:39:38 PM »
Bach Man,

I just received the balloon stack and stovepipe stack I ordered for my large scale 55 ton 3-truck shay. Unfortunately, neither stack came with the base needed to attach to the boiler. The catalog pictures showed the base but I will now admit that the base part number was not listed, as shown in the reference schematics.

My question is why would you sell the stacks this way and how can I rectify this situation?

This does not appear to be the best way to market parts."

Wonder how long this one will last???

Bob C.

Bob, and fellow large scale modelers,

I’ve been lurking here for several months but Bob’s kidnaping of my query to Bach Man about parts to this forum site has necessitated that I join to provide clarification.

My objective in posting on the Bachmann forum site was first to seek a solution to a parts problem and second to warn others of a possible problem. I am aware of the earlier postings about the sand or steam domes purchased by Josh. But my situation is a little different. I puchased two smoke stacks from Bachmann recently to go with my large scale 55 ton 3-truck shay that has a straight stack and included an optional cabbage (or onion) stack. Both of these have a built in base to mate with the smokebox. The balloon (Radley-Hunter) and stovepipe (Lima Diamond) stacks I ordered require a separate base piece to mate with the smokebox. Bachmann shows the two stacks with the base piece in their pictures in the parts section of their site. I then assumed that the base pieces were included. On the other hand, the pictures of both the K-27 steam and sand domes clearly show no base. So I believe I have a different problem here.

Now it is possible that Bachmann forgot to include the bases in my order. I am pursuing contact with the Bachmann parts department both via e-mail and phone. But as you know, they are not good at returning calls.

But the possible real issue here is that Bachmann may not be marketing complete parts on their internet site. They may infact be marketing replacement parts. If so, their site could be misleading.

For now I am giving Bachmann the benefit of the doubt. I have always liked Bachmann products realizing they often were not “perfect”. But then again their cost was very reasonable. So, I am not jumping on Bachmann at this time and am only asking for them to help me out of this problem situation.

Jim
rrcycle

Good news!

I got the Bachmann parts department on the phone this morning and the missing bases to the smoke stacks was an oversight. Jennifer with parts was very nice and is taking care of this.

Also, as a consequence of my posting on the “Ask Bach Man site” I received a reply and e-mails from the Bachmann Communications Manager, Jack Lynch, and from the Parts Manager, Bridget, requesting information so that they could correct the shipping error.

So, my goal of getting help for a problem by posting on the Bachmann site was met. I am very pleased with their fast and courteous response.

Thumbs up to Bachmann!

Jim

Josh, have you heard from the Bach-Man?

Jim,

Glad you got things worked out!

cale

That’s good Jim. Its always better to try to resolve a problem than to come out guns a blazin’. I did read your original post and thought that’s what you were trying to do.

-Brian

Jim,

First, Welcome aboard!

My post of your ‘hijacked’ post on the Bachmann web site was mostly intended tongue in cheek, as this thread began over another persons similar, albeit more vehement, post there. His was later removed by the moderators at Bachmann. Your post was far more in line with the intent and I personally read it that way. For my part there was no need for an explanation, and I apologize if I stepped out of bounds.

Bob C.