Large Scale Central

Mallet in winter

Ok…crappy weather struck this week, and since I’m not able to get out and work on the layout, I went to work in The Bunker instead. Of the several projects laying around, the parts for a 2-6-6-2 I’d been noodling with were laying there, so whut the heck. I had a prototype, Mud Bay Logging No8, a 1928 product of Baldwin…

While No8 (later she was Weyerhaeuser No6, and survives still today) was a standard gauge loco, I’m hoping to capture her ‘look’ in a narrow gauge model rather than an attempt at a true scale model. Her designation will be WV&K No 101. Both the ET&WNC and EBT had notions of a 2-6-6-2 that never came to pass, so this s gonna be a “What If” project. Other than the Uintah 2-6-6-2s (They were NOT mallets, they were simple articulateds, there’s a difference) the only NG articulateds were export locos. The project is being conducted from stuff I’ve been stockpiling for the last 10 years, and as a base I picked a pair of Big Haulers that had run flawlessly for me in the past. The work of removing all the Craptronics had been done on one, but I had to gut the other. Finally I was able to start adding new bits, and the journey towards Malletdom had begun. First was adding new counter weights on all drivers. New cylinder assemblies are next.

Bart,
A great start!
Keep us posted.
I have a bunch of 0-4-0 parts I keep looking at and say Hmmmmmm to myself.
jb

Awesome project, Bart! I’m looking forward to seeing your progress.

Bashing a small articulated is one of my long-term goals, ever since I saw a photo of a tiny 0-4-4-0 that ran on a Mexican mining railroad.

Wa-hey another Mallet. congrats Here’s how mine ended up, based on Weyerhuaser N06

(http://smegworld.org.uk/spaf/mallet/log/images/800smoke.jpg)

(http://www.smegworld.org.uk/spaf/mallet/log/images/mont.jpg)

full story at http://www.smegworld.org.uk/spaf/mallet/log/malletlog.htm good luck mate

Ok…thats Inspirational right there!

Go for it Bart, I really want to see this.

Best of luck.

R

Some progress yesterday. Roughed in the High Pressure Cylinders…

(http://www.trainweb.org/wcng/TheShops/mallet101/10105.jpg)

And started fabricating the low pressure ones…

(http://www.trainweb.org/wcng/TheShops/mallet101/10106.jpg)

(http://www.trainweb.org/wcng/TheShops/mallet101/10107.jpg)

Vicarious reuse of Bachmann parts are apparent…

Just a thing to keep an eye on Bart. The bachmann chassis as is have a wider axle spacing then the No6 and there is a danger of ending up with an over long skinny looking loco. I closed mine up and it worked ok, then theres that thing about moving the con rod to the rear drivers.

Good luck…

Yes I agree abut the driver spacing, but I’m hoping to hide most of that by painting the drivers black and the valve gear a nice gunmetal so that folks focus on the whirling motion instead of the too far apart wheels. Also gonna put an appropriately chubby boiler on it, need to find a place that carries 2.5" PVC conduit, 3" is too big and 2" looks anemic. Got the extention to the rear driver figgered out already methinks. Just looking towards a crappy day to have a go at it…Stay Tuned…

(DUH!!! It just dawned on me we are talking about the SAME locomotive…Mud Bay No8 became Weyerhaueser No6 later in life…)

You two both do beautiful work. Will that new engine fit that wye you bui;t?

I was wondering when the penny was going to drop :slight_smile:

Doug Arnold said:
You two both do beautiful work. Will that new engine fit that wye you bui;t?
Yeah the wye is basically 6 ft radi, prolly a little larger.......anything Annie will go round, Mallet is sure to fit......

OK having a quandry here. not sure which boiler looks the best… 2.5" PVC…

(http://www.trainweb.org/wcng/TheShops/mallet101/10109.jpg)

or 3" PVC?

(http://www.trainweb.org/wcng/TheShops/mallet101/10108.jpg)

Comments?

I like the white better. The gray one looks long, but I’m sure thats just because of the diameter being smaller.

But what do I know :o

Jon

Looking good… I’d mockup a cab before deciding on the boiler diameter.

I agree with Jon, shorter and thicker looks stronger.

OK gang…here’s DA POOP. After a little research and the realization I’m not gonna believably cut a Standard gauge loco down to NG proportions, I’ve decided to abandon No6…and take a never was and build it into my what if…

(http://www.trainweb.org/wcng/TheShops/mallet101/100plans.jpg)

These are the proposed drawings for a 2-6-6-2 for the ET&WNC, that never got built. She rated a 66" boiler and 44" drivers. With a 3" boiler that scales out to 60" in 1:20 with 41" drivers. Comparisons of some of the rough dimensions brings me to believe this was gonna be a husky little narrow gauge loco, and my No 100 was gonna have close dimensions. I am therefore abandoning a true prototype and modeling a locomotive built in 1927 for the West Virginia & Kentucky Narrow Gauge Operations in the Big Sandy Valley. (And it prolly won;t fit through Ric’s Shed either…Andy…ya gotta get some track down man!)

3 inch PVC pipe looks more like a steam locomotive and less like a rocket ship, as does the 2.5 inch pipe.

Only one opinion I would offer concerning fitting domes. It’s much easier, and less work, to cut a hole in the boiler the diameter of the dome base than to try and profile the base of the dome to fit the boiler diameter. Trust me on this… :slight_smile:

Also I note from the cylinder dims that the ETWNC loco is nt a mallet but an articulated, are you going to retain the large cylinders at the front, I think it would help with the appearence if you did.

Yeah I noticed its just an articulated too, I wonder about that…of course the proposal was made in 1926 the same time they were building the Uintah 2-6-6-2. Anyone recall (Kevin?) when they pitched a 2-6-6-2 to the EBT? Wonder if theres a pattern here. At any rate mines gonna stay a mallet. As for domeage, I’ve got a large and small belt sander that I use pretty easily to get rounded profiles on underside of domes, then a bit of styrene for a flange, some putty to get a round taper and Bobs Yer Uncle…course in this case I’m considering reusing the Bmann ones I have, so that might require all new dirty tricks…