Thankyou Ralph and Jerry.
Also apologies to Jerry for the incorrrect spelling of your name. I have been here quite a while (Aug 2003) and I like to feel I can get on with pretty much every one. I appreciate the clarification, I feel the original point was lost in translation maybe. I do also have friends on other fora, including GSC, which I do support also.
It is because of that I take a pragmatic view when reading posts that are, how shall we say, less complimentary about GSC? That is upto the indivduals and although I consider some of the views ill founded, based on conjecture I will also concede that there may be a genuine perception that one has been wronged. So I agree to differ, but see no point in saying so as views have become so polarised
In this most recent exchange some of you know it would clearly have been a conflict of interest for me to get embroiled in the debate. I would hope however that this recent spat could be consigned to the history pile and we move on. If you feel that I am tarred by association then I am sorry, but I believe that to be unreasonable, much as I would n’t dream of slagging off LSC or its entire membership enmasse, just because a few individuals have been a little wide of the mark in their assumptions.
This assertion is not directed at any particular individual here, past or present, it is merely a personal observation on my approach to the various fora I frequent, which as last count was three.
So in a nutshell I shall continue my support for GSC and LSC in the wider context.
regards
Rod