PETE - it is my opinion, based only on fact, that the RH Darjeeling loco uses a whole lot of components that are common to a lot of other RH products, and TBH, I see very little innovation in that model, even down to the slot-head screws used to hold the buffer beams on. The cylinders are common RH cylinders, the wheels and much of the valve gear are common parts and so on. The cab is a piece of bent metal on four rods and by contrast with the overwhelming level of detail present on most Accucraft models, to me it looks very simplistic. but then, I HAVE an Accucraft NGG16.
Add to that the fact that RH have a more-or-less guaranteed audience who would buy a cowpat if it was made by RH, and they have it made.
Nothing at all wrong with RH - on the contrary, they make beautiful stuff that goes on forever, as, indeed they should at the prices they charge for them. I truly winced when buying my £1100 ‘Harlech Castle’ a year or so back, which has the least convincing sound system I’ve heard in my life. I was so concerned about it that I sent it back to the Doncaster factory to have it checked out, but it seems that that is the way it was made…ho hum.
By contrast, almost everything you can name, component-wise, of the Accucraft loco is brand-new, and it shares nothing with any other loco I can think of, externally, that is.
All that innovation, and the relatively few numbers that they will sell, by contrast with the few hundred Darjeeling Ds, will bring the price up, no matter who makes it, and where. As an aside, it’s interesting to note that every single Accucraft NGG16 I’ve seen for sale second-hand has been priced the same as, or slightly more than it cost when new.
If I had the funds, I’d be joining the lucky few, but my days of buying big bucks models are long gone.
tac
OVGRS