Curmudgeon said:
Nothing wrong with a Pinto.
Unless you wanted good mileage.
They were not prone to blowing up.
Unless you got nailed in the rear while stopped with the doors open by a 3/4 ton GMC with a camper shell doing 55.
Had a 72 wagon, 2.0 with auto for many years.
Mavericks worked just fine, as did Comets.
Edsels worked good (and still do), they were wrong market.
My daugther’s first car was a Mustang II.
Took her through high school and 4 years of college.
Used, $500.
Not exactly sure you have ever owned any of those.
Sure, you win, all Fords are great and GM sucks. Pinto was a good car…of course that did not stop the bumper falling off the front of my dads brand new pinto while he was driving down the freeway! Took out both right tires as I recall.
Point is all companies make good cars and all companies make garbage. Seems silly to me to limit ones choices based on cars they don’t even make anymore. That’s my point. One should not base their decision to buy/not buy a 2009 Malibu on the merits of a '74 Vega, nor should I forgo that '09 Mustang GT based on my old '74 Capri.
For the record, I owned a 1974 Mercury Capri (Ford product, they sold it). Worst piece o’crap I ever owned. Bad clutch at 40K, blown tranny at 80K. Ball joint broke and lost control of the steering. Got me through college but nearly killed me! I’ve owned Fords, GM’s, Chryslers, Nissans, Jaguars, Opels, Fiats, and many more. I keep an open mind when it comes to most things, including Fords.