Large Scale Central

Steelers to Lose Super Bowl Trophies

General Discussion
#1

Steelers to Lose Super Bowl Trophies

Pittsburgh, PA. The Super Bowl XLIII Champion Pittsburgh Steelers, the only team to win six titles, will soon be losing half of those trophies. After a meeting between NFL Commissioner Rodger Gadel and President Barack Hussain Obama, Obama decided to redistribute half of their Steeler Super Bowl victories and trophies to less fortunate teams in the league.

“We live everyday in the country that invented the Super Bowl.” said Obama “We are not about to lose this Great American tradition in the wake of these difficult times.” Obama’s plan calls for the Steelers, who are a successful NFL team, to give half of their Super Bowl trophies to teams that are not successful or have not been as successful as the Steelers. “The Detroit Loins are just as much a part of the same fiber of the NFL as the Steelers and they should, no rather will, be entitled to a Super Bowl Trophy as well.” Obama explains in his plan that he has imposed on Godel and the NFL.

The Pittsburgh Steelers, who by virtue of hard work, excellent team play, stellar draft choices, responsible investing of free agents, careful hiring of coaches and excellent community service and commitment to their fans, has prospered greatly during the past 30 years and have won six Super Bowl Trophies. But President Barack Hussain Obama’s plan calls for the Pittsburgh Steelers to carry the larger burden of the NFL’s less successful teams. Obama went on to further proclaim, “In these difficult times we are all in this to work together. We must reclaim the NFL Championship Dream for every team, for every city and for every fan.”

“My plan will not affect 31 of the 32 teams in the league.” Obama assures. That’s over 95 percent of the teams in the NFL will not have to worry about loosing any Super Bowl Trophies. “The worst teams in the NFL and the teams that can’t seem to get a break and win a championship will no longer have to worry about going without a title.” Obama promises. “We are a country and league of hope. We all need to make a change. It does not matter the color of the teams uniforms, the personal decisions that the teams make or their performance but rather if they are a member of this great American league.”

The Super Bowl XLIII trophy will be redistributed to the 0-16 Detroit Lions. Through no fault of their own incompetence, the Lions could not manage a victory all season and this trophy will help ease the pain of their lack of performance and give them hope once again. The redistribution of Super Bowl XL trophy will go directly to the Steeler’s division rival the Cincinnati Bengals. The Bengals who also have fallen on hard times have never won a Super Bowl. This victory will bring a smile to hundreds of Bengal fans all over the world as they can now celebrate. Finally, one of the Steeler’s two Super Bowl victories over the Dallas Cowboys will go back to the Cowboys since the league needs to provide hope in the face of difficulty and provide hope in the face of uncertainty. This is a heavy burden for the Steelers but together we can all prosper.

All hope is not lost for Pittsburgh fans, Barack Hussain Obama has another plan in place. Obama has meet with MLB and commissioner Bud Selig on a similar plan. The New York Yankees will redistribute two of their world series trophies to the Pittsburgh Pirates as a supplement to their loosing 16 straight seasons and counting. This plan will help stimulate the Pirates and enable them to regain the American Dream. Barack Hussain Obama will be meeting with the NHL and Michael Phelps in the upcoming weeks as this issue is high on his agenda for “Hope and Change.”

#2

(http://lsc.cvsry.com/troll-web.jpg)

#3

Are you sure you know what a troll is?

#4

I certainly do, and 99% of your posts fit the definition.

I won’t be responding again.

#5

Thank you from here in The Motor City, that’s the ONLY way our Lions will ever get a Super Bowl Trophy!
GO RED WINGS !

#6
Jon Radder said:
I certainly do, and 99% of your posts fit the definition.

I won’t be responding again.


Problem solved.

#7

When you post ridiculous empty headed crap, it’s much more convincing if you at least spell the guy’s name right!

It’s Barack Hussein Obama

#8

BO for short…:wink:

#9

Would you prefer I refer to our Usurper in Chief as BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II,a/k/a :BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA Jr., a/k/a :BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :BARRY OBAMA , a/k/a :BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a : BARRY DUNHAM?

This guy is slippery than The Slickmeister himself, B.J. Clinton.

#10

Slippery indeed–he sometimes used a nickname, or the name his mother took when she remarried, when he was a kid Wow–slippery. What a sinister guy! Even as an eight year old he was plotting ways to confuse you!

And it worked!

Michael “mike” O’Malley

#11
mike omalley said:
Slippery indeed--he sometimes used a nickname, or the name his mother took when she remarried, when he was a kid Wow--slippery. What a sinister guy! Even as an eight year old he was plotting ways to confuse you!

And it worked!

Michael “mike” O’Malley


:lol:
Ralph

#12
mike omalley said:
Slippery indeed--he sometimes used a nickname, or the name his mother took when she remarried, when he was a kid Wow--slippery. What a sinister guy! Even as an eight year old he was plotting ways to confuse you!

And it worked!

Michael “mike” O’Malley


I have no problem with you being an apologist for Obama, but it would be good to know exactly who is this guy. Agreed?

Where was he born? What is his legal name? What are his views of the role of government? Does he hold Marxist values over free-enterprise? Does he have any experience as an executive officer, even at a McDonalds? Who are his associates and mentors? His college records, Selective Service registration, passport(s), medical records. All things that have been deemed important with previous holders of the office. His qualifications, as best as I can determine is he is 20% African-black, he was a community rabble-rouser, he had less than 200 days of legislative service in Illinois and the US Senate, he learned to become an eloquent speaker after twenty years listening to the right Reverend Wright.

I’d prefer you mike, with some real world experience, as POTUS, if you are able to meet the requirements in the US Constitution, even as liberal as you have professed to be.

#13

They used to call Ronald Reagan the Teflon President.
Whatever our current President is, evidence suggests he is not:

A Muslim. His Chief of Staff is Jewish, his Treasury Sec. as well as many others in his administation.

A Socialist. At least not according to the editor of “The Socialist”.
He says he’ll explain why at 11:00am Monday.
Ralph

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/03/13/DI2009031302440.html?hpid=discussions

#14

“Billy Wharton, editor of The Socialist, will be online Monday, March 16 at 11 a.m. ET to discuss his Outlook article on how the word “socialist” has been thrown around in the media and by politicians – and to explain what a real socialist thinks of President Obama’s economic policies being labeled as such.”

Never heard of the guy, but then again I’ve never read the Washington Post. Do any of you guys read the Centralia Sentinel? AndyC. can’t get it. He lives a mile south of the furthest delivery spot.

#15
Ric Golding said:
"Billy Wharton, editor of The Socialist, will be online Monday, March 16 at 11 a.m. ET to discuss his Outlook article on how the word "socialist" has been thrown around in the media and by politicians -- and to explain what a real socialist thinks of President Obama's economic policies being labeled as such."

Never heard of the guy, but then again I’ve never read the Washington Post. Do any of you guys read the Centralia Sentinel? AndyC. can’t get it. He lives a mile south of the furthest delivery spot.


Now I do read the Post online. The story about “Upholding gun rights in DC” came from the Post. Lot of our politicians contribute their opinions to the Post.
I like to keep up with the “Spin”.
But my tongue was firmly “in cheek” regarding “The Socialist” :slight_smile:
Ralph

#16

Oh, I doubt we can expect an honest dialog with the Socialist. One of their tenets is “the ends justify the means”. I heard the president of the American Communist Party on TV saying Obama wasn’t socialist enough, but Sarah Palin is more socialist then BHO. Talk about spin.