Jon Radder said:
As far as EBT interchange goes, to me it is not important to be historically accurate here,. "Could have been" is good enough for me. I've never seen evidence of any standard gauge flat interchanged with the EBT. Boxcars and gondolas were common. I'd still rather do a flat for ease of building.
Your plan also sounds like it will be much more detailed than my personal needs require. The level of detail on the EBT box car thread is more than enough for me. 
Jon
Well, isn’t that the beauty of model railroading? You can do whatever you want, to any level of detail, or … not. I remember seeing a guy with a beautifully detailed HO scale UP Big Boy hauling a loooooong string of twin stacks! Worked for him, I guess.
I had actually built a version of this flatcar about 25 years ago in 1/2" scale as my first foray into large scale. I had it about 95% complete, but lost interest due to career, etc. I have no idea where that model is today. Considering that it was constructed of aircraft plywood, it probably didn’t survive. About a year ago I ran across the rough drawings I had made back then and got fired up to build the same car.
Other projects for the near-mid future include a distinctive C&O hopper - the 70-ton HT, series 100000-101999. These would be relatively easy to model as they no not have offset tops/sides, but do have the typical C&O arched end extensions. These were originally built by AC&F in their Huntington shops in 1951, so they would be appropriate to being pulled by an H8. I believe Bob has a future project for a hopper car in the works, so I probably won’t bore you folks with this car.
However, my other project is to build a 1937 AAR boxcar with dreadnaught ends. The 1937 AAR 40’ boxcar was produced in massive numbers and with a bewildering array of options and modifications. I am interested in the basic design, as accepted in June of 1936: a steel, double sheathed car with rectangular paneled steel roof, ten panel steel side sheathing, 6’ horizontally ribbed doors, 10’0" inside height with dreadnaught ends (4 over 5), and an underframe with center sill consisting of twin 12 7/8" I beams.
There are several variations that I might also be interested in: the dreadnaught ends for a 10’6" inside height (5 over 5), both Murphy and Viking roofs, and differing widths of doors (6’, 7’ and 8’) in both original and Youngstown design. (these came with 6’, 7’ and 8’ doors in various combinations). The problem has been finding good drawings of the ends: though produced by AC&F in their St. Louis shops, no one, no even the MOT in St. Louis, seems to have these drawings. Fortunately, I discovered recently that the Eastern Connecticut Railroad Museum in Willimantic has in its collections Central Vt Boxcar #54524. Though built in 1949, it was built according to the original 1937 AAR specs and has improved dreadnuaght ends. I plan to go down there later in May when they open to take some photos and measurements.
Brian