Zubi Wrote
"You will not be able to defend anything by referring to the scientific use of the word “model” since the objective of their creation is different than “pleasure” and “play”. "
I have to dissagree. The last four words of the deffintion say it all. “represents the real thing.” I think the case for all model railroaders has just been made.
So now lets look at this in a logical way.
“A toy is an object used in play.”
So toy = play
People play with models.
so model = play
there for one can say with 100% correctness that
model = toy
Now one can get pleasure from making a model. this is called modeling.
so model = pleasure
its also known that playing brings pleasure.
play = pleaseure
So. Play = pleasure, pleasure = model, model = toy., play = toy.
So your statement of :
"You will not be able to defend anything by referring to the scientific use of the word “model” since the objective of their creation is different than “pleasure” and “play”. "
Not only did I defend it, I proved with scientific use that the objective of pleasure and play is the same and not different.
So I guess it doesn’t matter what they make so long as everyone can get out of it what they like weather that be pleasure of having the model or wonting to play with there new toy.