Suggestion for clarity:
Problem Example:
The recent lengthy (5 pages) of commentary on whether TrainWorld was going to continue carrying large scale trains did include, on one of the last pages, a statement by the owner affirming that TrainWorld would continue to carry large scale. He also referenced the source cited in the initial posting as not accurate.
Then, on a separate posting from one of our members, was the headline TrainWord was going to keep selling large scale. There was no copy of the owner’s statement. Only an enthusiastic statement that appeared to be only personal opinion. If a person did happen to read the statement from the owner tucked into the last pages of the previous post, it made sense. Otherwise, as I noted, since I did not read the owner’s statement in the last pages of the lengthy discussion. I posted there appeared to be missing data between the initial claim and this latest opinion.
The outcome was I received irritation for challenging the owner’s statement – which I neither saw nor read because it was not repeated in this new post.
Conclusion:
If you create a new posting and reference another posted topic, please copy the data that is critical to your claim instead of presuming everyone reads the sometime lengthy discussions where the crucial information is finally posted.