Greg Elmassian said:
There’s a number of decoders that can be programmed without a DCC system Oh, so can the QSI…
Also you can get a brand new 2 amp DCC system for $150…
Yes, you can use PC interfaces to program DCC decoders without “needing” a DCC system. QSI has their proprietary interface, and you can use JMRI and a SPROG to program any number of other boards. That’s added hardware and hoops to jump through. And, yes, you can get a low-end, low-power DCC system if you wanted to. The JMRI/SPROG system is cheaper, and the programming interface is infinitely more user-friendly.
Again, folks who are of the mindset to jump through those hoops are not using analog DC track power.
Greg Elmassian said:
And you can slow the loco to a stop and it will still make sound… the track will be around 5 volts…
Yes, but what happens when you change directions? A fair number of systems drop the track voltage to 0 volts before allowing you to change directions as a safety feature to prevent gears from stripping. The sound drops out. There’s no way around it unless you can connect some kind of “keep-alive” to the decoder. More complexity added to the equation.
The simple reality is this… DCC decoders have pretty much always had the ability to operate in analog DC. They have never made inroads to the analog DC sound market in any scale. Pretty much the only place you’ll find DCC decoders being used for sound in analog DC environments are where folks are buying DCC-equipped locos because that’s the only way the locos come from the factory.
Yes, DCC decoders are cool. (I use 'em for exactly that reason!) The folks who specifically want that kind of control over the sound are not the ones running analog DC track power. It’s a different mindset. Analog DC is simple. Put the loco on the track, apply voltage, watch it move. DCC decoders are not remotely aimed at that kind of modeler. Not by a long shot.
Later,
K