Depends on what you’re looking for in a model.
Option 1 is based on a specific prototype, if tweaked a bit for gauge. It looks all the world for the Maine 2’ forneys, and has a level of detail far and above either of the two other options. Despite B’manns quality issues, all of my B’mann locos are top-drawer runners, so I’d have no hesitation going for this one if that’s a concern. Price, obviously, is a concern. On the other hand, the socket and either the Revolution, QSI, or RCS boards makes converting this loco to battery dirt simple.
Option 2 is decidedly un-detailed and I think the trailing truck is a bit small, but that’s an aesthetic thing. The Accucraft model is essentially a basic blank canvas upon which you can hang whatever details you’d like. It’s live steam, which means it’s not a “turn it on and watch it run” thing if that’s what you’re looking for. Live steam has its own benefits, though, and is quite addictive in its own right. It is not something you do with a yard full of kids distracting you. (I haven’t fired my steamers up in two years.)
Option 3 is “old reliable,” and while not a specific prototype, does capture the spirit of the Maine forneys. The details are a bit coarse, and it’s not a “true” forney in that the front chassis pivots under the boiler. Depending on which version it is, it would likely benefit from either a minor or complete repaint to look good. And by all means, PLEASE replace the engineer with one who takes up the appropriate amount of space in the cab! That pygmie they put in the cab can’t even see out the window.
Personally, I’d go for Option 1, because I’m too much of a purist to stomach the front pilot swiveling out from underneath the boiler. It’s worth the extra money just for that alone. That, and my experience with Bachmann locos has been overwhelmingly positive so I have no doubts that this would be a smooth runner. Maybe not as robust as LGB’s, but I don’t torture-test my locos, either. (My daughter, on the other hand…)
Later,
K