Mik said:Ralph Berg said:Ah, but is 19th century technology really a 21st century solution? If so, then why not canals? Change for the sake of change, without looking at the big picture and figuring how things fit together is infinitely MORE wasteful in the long run than continuing what we are doing now until a truly better solution emerges.
We can keep our head burried in the sand.........or we can get off our asses and make some changes. RalphOf course, we could just outlaw/ limit domestic flights, especially those with less than x number of passengers and redundant routes (thereby creating monopolies with all the unpleasant economic side effects they cause). And we could always tax the hell out of personal vehicles, like they do in some countries you’ve held up as role models. Methinks even the sheep might revolt at that though.
I give examples of countries using rail and now they are my role models?
Rail won’t help me one bit…as I live in a rural area.
I don’t sit in bumper to bumper traffic, but I do remember what it was like on Central Expressway and the LBJ in Dallas, I-75 in Detroit and various other congested hell holes they call expressways or freeways.
Air travel has become just as miserable…so I no longer fly.
I found my solution so I guess I’ll drop the subject and let all the urban dwellers sit in traffic.
Since deregulation the airlines have failed to keep their aging fleets up to date. The average age of their planes is higher than any point in our history. When they start dropping out of the sky…you won’t find me on any of the passenger lists.
Ralph