Steve Featherkile said:
Why would the hemlock need that sort of cover. It doesn't look like it would provide all that much protection. What was EBT's thinking behind this car?
SteveF
I’m not entirely certain, because in addition to these cars and stock cars, they also used uncovered flat cars to carry the bark. Certainly at the tanneries, the bark wasn’t covered; rather it was piled 20’+ high. It could very well be that they built these cars specifically so they could double as excursion cars. Community picnics and other social gatherings were quite common in the days before the automobile, and it was normal for railroads to run special trains to the picnic grounds. A photo of one such picnic train on the EBT shows no fewer than 6, possibly 8 Dolly Varden cars in the consist. It very well could be that these cars were intended for the dual use from the beginning. A 1874 Billmeyer and Smalls catalog lists an excursion car as part of their regular line of equipment, so the need for such cheap mass conveyance seems to have been rather prevalent. (The B&S car excursion car is a bit more refined than the EBT’s Dolly Varden cars, but still wouldn’t be considered “passenger” equipment by any means.) It’s certainly cheaper to roster a small fleet of dual-purpose cars than a fleet of expensive passenger equipment that gets used maybe two or three times a summer.
About half of the EBT’s Dolly Varden cars were scrapped in the 20s shortly after the tanneries shut down. Some were retired in the mid 1910s, but a half-dozen or so lasted until the mid 30s. By this time, the EBT didn’t need them to serve the tanneries, and they had by then acquired ample passenger equipment to handle the special excursions of the day–as cars were becoming far more commonplace.
Later,
K