Er , no Jon , I don’t ,sorry . I find the unedited version more interesting , it tells more of a story --even showing how up to date the picture is from the clothing the gentleman is wearing .
And who IS the chap with a red flag ? Must be a railway bloke . What was due down the line just after ? Or had it just passed ?
I can see the point of making corrections to pictures for art’s sake , nothing wrong with that . But remember , 50 years down the line , your published photo may be taken literally as what the local scene was .
Your original intent was , I assume , to present a modern scene containing a bit of history . Well , you got the bit of history in OK .
The picture and your comments raise an interesting point , where should we stop with altering pictures ?
When does it become acceptable to improve the appearance of , say , a model , to present it in a better light ?
There are a couple of railway publications in the UK wherein they publish original photos , warts and all , and ask for the readers’ help in identifying where it was taken , or when —I think you get the picture . A lot of the time , it is not the prime interest item , such as a loco , that gives the location/time / circumstances , it is things like telegraph poles–fashion changes them , too --shadows , people and their mode of dress —Victorian , Edwardian , and so on .
Why not publish the before and after side by side ? Then people like me who download them will know which to use for best purpose .
Both pictures are damn good though , aren’t they ?
Thanks ,
Mike