Jerry Bowers said:Ralph Berg said:Exactly why would Congressman Westmoreland be an embarrassment to Alabama? He is an elected representative of Georgia.
. . . is an embarrassment to the Republican party and the [b]State of Alabama[/b], (emphasis added)RalphFirst we have “pregnant 7 year olds”, then a claimed secessionist who never participated in the so-called secessionist party, and now a Congressmen who is from more than one state. Wow, those conservatives are really bad folks!
Living in one of the most liberal areas of one of the more liberal states has shown me that the left really thinks there is a boogeyman behind every thought, statement, or action, and will frequently make and use statements that are really off the wall to prove their points. That kind of rabid response actually winds up defeating the original points.
I very politely suggest some of you guys who do nothing but attack, attack, attack need to take a couple of deep breaths between jabs.
Back on topic, I agree that Congress Westmoreland’s comment could be considered to have racial overtones, but similar to Obama’s denial that his proven dealings with the indicted criminal Rezko had absolutely no sinister content, I suggest accepting the Congressman’s explanation. It doesn’t make much difference to me, as to the best of my knowledge, he doesn’t also represent California.
Happy RRing,
Jerry
My mistake Jerry.
Somehow got Alabama in my head instead of Georgia.
I do many things besides attack.
I don’t accept his explanation. I’ve lived in the South for 28 years. I know exactly what he meant.
Who do you think he was trying to stop from voting by trying to block renewal of the 1965 voters right act?
Ralph