Victor Smith said:
Hehehe - fun direction this topics taking...
One persons gold is anothers garbage.
I hate cheesy gaudy crappy trains like New Bright produces, but I have had very good success converting Scientific Toys frieght cars by simply adding bogie trucks, new couplers, and painting them into very reasonable narrow gauge cars.
I’ve taken the creme de la creme of crapola from Mr Bachmann, namely the 2-4-2 Columbia, gutted it and made a nifty engine representing a geared Dunkirk!
It is all relative…one persons garbage IS anothers gold.
Vic,
Re: Hehehehe
No problem, just because some people don’t get the message, doesn’t mean the message hasn’t been sent.
If someone asks me what I think of “X” based on my experience, I’ll tell him/her.
I’ve been doing that in several different fields for many, many years, model railroads is just one of them.
And it happens sometimes that someone who heard about that same “Deal” went ahead, bought it and then kicked himself. Of course at first he thought the other guy, who went on my advice, was a “rube”.
One can almost make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear, given enough time and extra money. In those cases I usually ask: “Do you really like tinkering and do you have all the “stuff” that you will need?”
“Stuff” is like “junk”, it comes in various guises and the “Way over my head” exclamation follows somewhere along the way.
More than thirty years ago I was building a HO layout, for some strange reason I needed a curved crossover to fit a specific situation. No one made such an animal in the required dimensions. So I decided to handlay the beast, never-ever handlaid a piece of track before, so the curved crossover was the perfect place to start. All my hobby buddies agreed!
But I had all the “stuff” required, it wasn’t very pretty since I used ties for the whole distance which ran the width of the double track section. What counted was reliability, since it was in a hidden section. BTW when I tore down the layout I didn’t save that part, it wasn’t remarkable enough in my opinion.
Oh yeah, while we’re on the track business, starting out in HOm I found out in a real hurry that the mfg’s track was “junk”. “Junk” in that case meant their own equipment wouldn’t run reliably on their own track. Alternative? Handlaid track! That mfg, who makes excellent rolling stock, later went with OEM track which also left much to be desired. IMO more junk! And anyone who would ask me if I would buy “X” brand, would hear “NO” and the exact reasons why not.
PS after rereading the above, YES we have an obligation and if asked, giving ones own experience with “X” product is in my opinion part of the obligation. It can be as pretty as first flower in the Spring, if it isn’t up to par in other ways, it needs to be mentioned when one is asked. And it also needs to be mentioned when one does reviews, writes contributions to mags or whatever. If someone’s holy ox gets gored in the process, too bad!
Of course one could also write an article entitled: “I took a perfect piece of junk and made something functional out of it!”. Since it would be several pages - what with all the fixing and mending - it should bring a bit of money, too.