Cliff Jennings said:
Huh, all this time I thought Rooster was his whole name. Like Enya or Cher.
Wait…it’s not???
Cliff Jennings said:
Huh, all this time I thought Rooster was his whole name. Like Enya or Cher.
Wait…it’s not???
So Rooster is really like Cher??
Fred Mills, SOG said:
It seems that a person can buy changes in the rules… at least that is the impression plainly given; the majority of members indicated that the new rules were fair to begin with, and there were just two persons who complained. The other person seems to have agreed to abide by the rules.
This sets a precedence, and soon this place will just be just like the “Other place” where nick names abound…to say nothing of “Locations”…so much for the “New and improved rules”.
Fred, I noticed you edited this after posting, but did you really mean to write this? In your analysis, only 2 people complained? And the fact that Bob introduced an expanded contribution system at the same time makes you suspect that people can buy changes ??
If I was Bob I would throw you out of my living room immediately for the suggestion that people can buy changes. How rude!
Pete Thornton said:
Fred Mills, SOG said:
It seems that a person can buy changes in the rules… at least that is the impression plainly given; the majority of members indicated that the new rules were fair to begin with, and there were just two persons who complained. The other person seems to have agreed to abide by the rules.
This sets a precedence, and soon this place will just be just like the “Other place” where nick names abound…to say nothing of “Locations”…so much for the “New and improved rules”.
Fred, I noticed you edited this after posting, but did you really mean to write this? In your analysis, only 2 people complained? And the fact that Bob introduced an expanded contribution system at the same time makes you suspect that people can buy changes ??
If I was Bob I would throw you out of my living room immediately for the suggestion that people can buy changes. How rude!
Y’know…Fred is a REALLY nice guy…but every now and then seems to go off the deep end. It really helps to have met him and talked with him over numerous occasions.
Sorry about all this Bob, I just wanted to say thank you!
Bruce Chandler said:
Y’know…Fred is a REALLY nice guy…but every now and then seems to go off the deep end. It really helps to have met him and talked with him over numerous occasions.
Well, OK. But this is Bob’s sandbox (sorry, living room,) and we’ve all got to do the appropriate thing: “Engage Brain before Opening Mouth” or before hitting the Post key.
Maybe if he’d talked to Bob on numerous occasions it would have helped him not make such a statement?
Pete Thornton said:
Bruce Chandler said:
Y’know…Fred is a REALLY nice guy…but every now and then seems to go off the deep end. It really helps to have met him and talked with him over numerous occasions.
Well, OK. But this is Bob’s sandbox (sorry, living room,) and we’ve all got to do the appropriate thing: “Engage Brain before Opening Mouth” or before hitting the Post key.
Maybe if he’d talked to Bob on numerous occasions it would have helped him not make such a statement?
Oh yeah. I’m not disagreeing with you at all Pete. I guess I’m just trying to make allowances for people I’ve met face to face. I sure wish I didn’t have to…especially after what we have just gone through.
Steve McKenzie said:
So Rooster is really like Cher??
Steve, YES… Except for the gender, hair, finger nails, and bank account… (https://www.largescalecentral.com/externals/tinymce/plugins/emoticons/img/smiley-sealed.gif)
I see this as proof of the old cliche “You can please some of the people all the time, and you can please all the people some of the time, but you can never please all of the people all the time”. For me it is simply:
Rule No. 1 “Bob’s living room, Bob’s rules”.
Rule No. 2 “When in doubt, refer to Rule No. 1”.
Bob Cope said:
I see this as proof of the old cliche “You can please some of the people all the time, and you can please all the people some of the time, but you can never please all of the people all the time”. For me it is simply:
Rule No. 1 “Bob’s living room, Bob’s rules”.
Rule No. 2 “When in doubt, refer to Rule No. 1”.
Or proof that some think that the rules surely don’t apply to them. It wasn’t that long ago that I thought this site was gone forever. Please don’t hasten its departure again.
Diesel Dude, TOC, Boomer, Rooster and Pete, all fictitous names… wait thats me, yes Pete is nowhere on any offficial record for me, but it has been my nickname since before I was born, and a lot of close friends would not know who you were talking about if you used my given name, so I for one see no problem with nicknames or “handles”. If Bob wants my real name I will give it to him, If I have to use it in forums and Chat, all I ask is everybody yell it when I come into the Bar… err chat room
Pete, just to refresh what is required and what is not…
Greg Elmassian said:
`Ahh… not to be misunderstood… was just making a joke about the picture of the rooster, not his name.
Michael, Bob relented on the “display name” and the requirement is the “real name” in the profile…
(although the location is still required afaik)
Greg
Poor Fred.
Michael Kirrene said:
Poor Fred.
poor us.
fred is a grumpy old fart, but he is “our” grumpy old fart.
0.02