If I read this right, Barry made a statement, and Stan made a reply.
Barry said:
The issue arose when TOC was writing his review for GR on the K. Dave calculated the gear ratio and it didn’t make any sense. The more we talked about it the more it began to come clear that they had produced this beautiful gear box, but had forgotten to include the double thread worm and worm gear (this is an absolute necessity, to prevent surging on down grades). If the gear box had been designed with a 29:1 gear ratio and then changed to a double thread worm and worm gear, the gear ratio would be 14.5:1. This is what had to have happened, because a 14.5 to 1 gear ration makes no sense. Further, the 9000 series Pittman motor is properly spec’d, just like my 8000 series motors, it is a HORSE and has enough power to overcome the
mechanical disadvantage of the 14.5 to 1 gear ratio.
We have surmised that by not fessing up (old texas term), they avoid any responsibility to correct the situation. But it is good to see the Mallet functioning so well.
Stan says:
Barry
An interesting analysis.
Perhaps there is a simple way to test your hypothesis by asking a few simple questions.
- What is the scale speed of the K27 as shipped with a double lead worm at 18 volts DC with its 1/14.5 gear ratio?
- What would be the scale speed of the K27 at 18 volts DC be if the double lead worm was replaced by a single lead worm with the same 1/14.5 gear box?
- What would be the scale speed of the K27 at 18 volts DC be with a double lead worm but the gear box was replaced by a 1/29 gear ratio?
- What was the max prototype speed of the K27 on the valley line south of Alamosa?
- What is the gear pitch of the production double lead worm and the pitch of a similar single worm gear?
- What would happen to the currect gear box if the double lead worm was simply replaced by a single lead worm?
I think you will find the answers to these questions of interest.
Stan
So, here’s what I took from Barry’s post:
The original idea was a 1:29 ratio, and the change to a double lead lead to an unintentional gearing mistake where the result was half that.
Here’s what I take from Stan’s post:
He posts 6 questions to “test Barry’s hypothesis”, but they do not address what Barry said at all.
The 6 questions are asking mostly what speed difference is there between a single lead and a double lead worm of the SAME gearing?
This is not the point… it’s “what is the speed difference between a 1:29 gear ratio and a 1:14.5 gear ratio”? That’s what the hypothesis is, someone made a mistake.
(no one was ever foolish enough to REQUEST a single lead worm, in light of previous experiences).
The answer is, as far as I can tell, the 1:14.5 will run twice as fast and have half the torque, which seems to be the reality on the K.
Regards, Greg