Large Scale Central

An Interesting Workday

Since I am presently unable to pratice my craft due to the total absence of money in the equipment development industry, I have been putting some time into volunteering and community work.

There was a small amount of money ‘left over’ from a recent FAA grant and fuel tax funded runway and taxiway improvement project at the small community airport that is in front of my house, office and shop. We asked and received FAA approval to use the left over cash to do a complete survey of the airport, and retained the services of a local registered civil engineer and licensed land surveyor. I volunteered to act as his rodman in order to save money while accomplishing the survey.

I was trained as a civil engineer, but have never worked in the field beyond the college summer jobs I held in the early 1960s. In my very limited experience, a survey like the one we are conducting would be done by a 3 person crew using a transit, rod and chain (a heavy duty specially marked measuring tape). The crew would consist of an instrument man, lead chain man and a stake setter. Surveying our airport property would take at least a week of these three people working 8+ hour days, perhaps more.

After waiting out several passing storms over the last week, we began the survey field work this afternoon, but using year 2000+ technology. Rather than a transit, the survey instrument is a Nikon theodolite. The only other piece of equipment is a rod with a precision prism target on the top and an optical level bubble at the midpoint. No chain is required. The theodolite is fully electronic, only requiring that the operator define the target at each shot. It determines the bearing (azimuth), vertical displacement (height) and slope distance between the instrument and the target on the top of the rod. In operation, this takes only a few seconds for each shot. It takes a lot longer to walk between the points!

The surveyor had previously set several “control points,” where he placed the instrument. Again, these points are arbitrarily chosen based on the ground to be surveyed and to be out of the way of automobile and aircraft traffic. He had placed a surveyor’s nail in the pavement at the control points. The theodolite even aligns itself precisely over the nail, with only a little help from the operator.

My job as rodman was to walk to each desired measurement point, put the rod on the point, get the level bubble in the center of the glass and call “point” on the radio. The surveyor calls back “good” when the theodolite has captured the data. Every point is chosen arbitrarily, based on what we are interested in and what we want to record. No stake setting required.

We worked about 4 hours today and completed well over 65% of the airport. We did have an additional person as safety officer carrying a handheld aircraft frequency transceiver to communicate with any approaching or departing aircraft and to warn me to vacate the runway to allow aircraft to takeoff or land. There was only one aircraft operation all afternoon, typical for our small country airport.

BTW, my friend and neighbor Jim was the safety officer. He spent one career as a U.S. Air Force mechanic on piston, then jet fighter planes. His second career was working for North American Aviation as a field engineer on Air Force fighter jets. His final career was as a ground services manager for the space shuttle. He took early retirement when the Challenger crash caused a hiatus in the shuttle program. Jim is well into his 80s, is a near lifetime pilot, owns two airplanes and flies them both regularly!

Darkness, cold and old age of the volunteers (Jim & myself) stopped our work at about 5:00pm. We expect to be able to complete the survey in about 2 to 3 more hours, but there are a series of storms moving into N. California, so we might not get to it until late next week.

Once all the points are stored, the surveyor will bring a very special precision GPS location device. That device will be used to accurately locate the (previously arbitrarily chosen) control points with an absolute accuracy of approximately 1/16"! The location of the control points is then applied by a computer program to all the points we shot today. Who says technology isn’t neat!!

Some of that data will be put into federal data bases and coordinate systems for future use in developing instrument approaches, etc. Other parts of the survey data will be used in future airport land acquisition, engineering and construction projects. It will also be used in determining appropriate setbacks and checking height restrictions for nearby trees, fences, buildings and other other potential obstructions to safe aircraft operation.

A tiring, but rewarding afternoon spent doing some community good and working with a couple of very good men.

Happy RRing,

Jerry

Fascinating, Jerry - thanks for sharing!

We had a wireless site survey done at work last year. The two engineers involved were POd because neither had thought to bring a piece of equipment that would’ve made the outside-of-the-buildings survey a doddle. Instead, they had to plod in the rain.

Not only does the modern equipment save time, it ensures greater accuracy than the manual exercise every time, provided the old guys don’t go to sleep on the job!

Jerry,

This last week I’ve had the pleasure of looking over some old original survey maps of extreme southern Illinois, tracing the Goshen Trail for bicycle trail developments. Looking at these notes and maps are a treat. You can’t help but feel and wonder about the hardships of the job as these guys plodded across the land. Notes in the books are a kick to read.

“Point” “Mark”

:wink:

Thanks for sharing.

Fascinating Jerry. I didn’t realize the 1/16" accuracy was possible with any civilian equipment.

Thanks for the positive feed back!

Ric: I too like seeing the old maps and information. My friend Sean is a Geographical Information Specialist (GIS), working for FEMA. He has an amazing colection of old railroad maps and information. He has also mapped every foot of rail that ever existed in the state of Nevada and is now working on California. When I challenge the “. . . every foot . . .” part, he just says I need to show him some that he missed!!

David: I too questioned the surveyor when he quoted the extreme accuracy of the RTK GPS system. He directed me to a site that discusses the equipment that will be employed. Here is a quote from that site:

"Survey grade systems come in 2 basic types: single frequency and dual frequency. With single frequency systems, data collection is slow and data collected must be “post processed” before the location information is obtained. Occupation times are long-generally 45 minutes to several hours. These systems are useful only for establishing control.

"This type of surveying with a single frequency system is called “static” mode GPS surveying. Some single frequency systems can collect data in static or Post- Processed Kinematic (PPK) mode, but the rate of data collection cannot compare to that produced by dual frequency systems. Also, if the single-frequency unit loses its signal when operating in PPK mode, it takes some time to re-initialize before survey work can begin again.

“Dual frequency systems only require post-processing when operating in static or “fast static”. . In Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS, the positional data are displayed and recorded immediately. Subcentimeter to millimeter level accuracies (both horizontal and vertical) are obtainable with both single and dual frequency technologies. To obtain true latitude, longitude, and elevation for new points, both systems need to occupy existing established control monmentation. Considerable skill, training, and expertise are required to operate either type of system effectively.”

Bold emphasis added.

I haven’t yet seen this RTK GPS gadget, but it doesn’t sound like it’s your uncle’s Tom Tom! Our surveyor doesn’t actually own or operate the RTK GPS system that will be used. He brings in a specialist who does that work. Still, it is relatively cheap with a one day estimate for $100 / hour.

Happy RRing,

Jerry

Jerry,

Thanks for sharing your “adventure” with us. I find the technology involved most interesting.

As the man said - fascinating stuff. Thanks for posting it.

Like many folks, I have a fascination with maps, mapping, charting and viewing the earth from overhead, no matter if it’s a hundred feet or a hundred miles - my Masters is in remote sensing. The ability to point-fix to less than two millimeters anywhere on the surface of the earth is a truly wondrous achievement, and great kudo goes to the US gubmint for allowing the civilian use of GPS in the fust place.

It would be v interesting to look at a LiDAR image of your location, too, and to see it from THAT particular sensor.

http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0103/lidar.html

tac
www.ovgrs.org

TAC:

Thanks for the link to the LIDAR page. I’ll look into those images.

I didn’t mention above that the surveyor uses the Google photo maps to rough out what we are working on, including locating his control points. Great use for it beyond looking into your neighbor’s back yard.

When GPS was in its infancy, I got to attend a seminar outlining how it worked and what it could do. At one of the discussion groups, the science guy made the comment that the military would soon be able to “put a guided weapon right down someone’s smoke stack.” The Air Force Colonel sitting next to him quickly corrected that statement, saying “Actually we will be able to put that weapon down the center of the smoke stack.” Laughs all around, but that has really come true!

To comply with the FAA’s requirements for funding our survey, it needs to tie into the FAA’s NAD83 and NAV88 datums. This is what requires the high precision of the RTK GPS system. When that part is completed, we will know the true location and elevation of every one of the approximately 400 points we will have shot to within less than 1"! The runway displaced thresholds (the point a landing pilot is aiming for) and the five local survey control points will be known to millimeter (~0.040") accuracy.

Happy RRing,

Jerry

Jerry,
like David, I believed that civilian GPS was intentionally ‘compromised’ in its accuracy. I know many sailors who started to rely on GPS only to find themselves uncomfortably close to shallow water when their instruments told them they were in fact hundreds of metres out from the shoreline in supposedly deep water. I was not aware that military and civilian GPS were so close in accuracy.

The GPS units designed for personal, automotive and marine navigation and bought at Costco for $100 to $250 are still only accurate to ~30m (~100ft.). Plenty good for finding out where the next turn is, but totally unacceptable for land survey work.

I have a handheld Garman aviation unit for use in an airplane that has about the same nominal resolution as the low end commercial units, but when I’m operating within an “augmented GPS” environment that is now available at many airports, the nominal accuracy improves to ~3m (~10ft.).

The RTK dual frequency survey units consist of several pretty good sized boxes and cost between $25,000 and $100,000. In order to get the advertised accuracy, the base station needs to be on a benchmark that is located to a know datum standard. In our case, the nearest such benchmark is well over a mile away in a straight line. It is about 1 3/4 miles away by road. It would require numerous instrument setups and moves to tie it into the airport points, with each setup introducing some error. Even using the theodolite, doing ‘inverted’ shots and back shooting would probably leave an error of a foot or so and would take most of a day to accomplish. The results would not qualify for the datums the FAA requires.

Using the RTK, the surveyor sets up on the known monument, and the instrument automatically determines its ‘real’ position within an hour or two. As I understand, the time required is mostly a matter of how many satellites are available during the acquisition phase. Once the base unit has determined its position, a sub unit is placed on the ‘unknown’ point on the airport and the instrument system again automatically gives us a high precision location within a half hour or so. We will be doing 7 high precision control points on the airport. The FAA technically only requires two, but the cost is the same to do all 7 of them, and the added data further reduces errors.

As I implied above, the RTK GPS is not a portable “where am I now?” device. It’s a complex, fairly large system that requires long occupation times and real skill to determine the points with the highest accuracy. That’s what we are after in this case.

I’ll report further after we get the RTK GPS work done.

Happy RRing,

Jerry

While serving in the Navy aboard several ship, we had SATNAV, GPS (which may be the same thing, I don’t know for sure), LORAN, and the Skipper still required us to shoot the stars each watch at night and take a noon sun sight, “because the stars don’t lie.” I was always amazed at how accurate everything was.

For many years a navigator was a vital part of an aircrew. The introduction of the early inertial reference systems, later called inertial navigation systems was very welcome in the civilian airline industry. What amazed me at the time was the size of these units, almost the size of a household refrigerator. A generation later they were considerably reduced in size and more accurate. Of cause, navigators either needed re-education or retirement. These units used gyroscopes as a point of reference and located themselves due natural forces applied to alter the position of the gyro.

One of my current development projects will employ MEMS (Micro ElectroMechanical Systems) technology accelerometers that will be combined to create an inertial guidance system. These multi-axis accelerometers (actually combined to be ‘gyroscopes’) are chip sized units. The whole INS unit will probably be less than 1 cubic inch and run on a single Li-Ion cell phone type battery.

These are the same multi-axis sensor assemblies that sense roll, pitch, and yaw inputs simultaneously on a vehicle or moving platform. One common use is in automobiles with active suspension and active handling controls. An accelerometer / sensor is placed on each corner of the car, and reports back to a central micro-controller. When the sensors and computer sense that the car is about to swap ends, the appropriate combination of brakes and power are automatically applied to keep the car from spinning out or worse. Several high-end cars are currently equipped with this technology.

The overall INS concept is exactly the same as the refrigerator-sized INS units in aircraft: Know the starting point, and use a gyroscope with sensors to keep track of all motion. That way, you will always know your current position. The difference is that these ‘gyroscopes’ are tiny (~3mm [~1/8"] square x ~0.5mm [~0.20"] thick) solid state quartz chips. Absolutely no moving parts, very low power requirements, and very high accuracy.

Our application is significantly different from the automotive ones. I can’t divulge the actual product yet, but it is in an area that would be termed ‘safety equipment’. It is a pretty exciting application. If the economy wasn’t so seriously tanked, we would be actively working on it. As it is, our small engineering team in just doing the imagineering part, with no money available to prototype this thing.

BTW, some of my favorite reading are stories of the development of the early long distance commercial air routes using Consolidated PBYs and similar amphibians or flying boats. One example is a Qantas commercial service between Colombo, Sri Lanka and Perth, Australia, a distance of well over 4,000 statute miles. This flight was non-stop, and totally navigated by sighting the stars (when they could see them) with a hand held sextant, then plotting positions on paper. PBYs were very slow airplanes (~125mph cruise) so this flight took something over 30 hours, all over open ocean. There were similar long distance flights between the Southwestern Pacific and South America. Those crews and passengers were very brave aviators! My father was a flight test engineer on the Consolidated PBYs and B24s during WWII.

Happy RRing,

Jerry

Jerry,
the Catalina flights to and from Colombo, were legendary stuff in both terms of navigation and endurance of both man and machine. When you consider that passenger numbers were usually only six to eight persons then it makes the journey more of an epic . I believe that the flights were quite regularly scheduled.

            I recall the early IRS equipment located in the front cargo hold of our Boeing 707 airliners,  being distinguished by their bulkiness.  The systems designed for the B747 were considerably smaller,  with the latest types around the size of a small stereo.  It is amazing that the technology has been reduced to the size of an icecube.