When I first read this thread , I had to go and check to see if we have the same loco , we already had the small Whitcomb (superb) and the faults outlined just did not seem to be about the Side Rod Biggie .
We put it on a rolling road , there is not the slightest wobble , or squeak .
Turning it upside down and running it showed no sign of wobble .
It was then tested under load and though it slowed slightly , it was difficult to get it to stop .
The loco was purchased when it was first advertised in the UK . I can only assume from that that it was one of the first built . We have just looked in the box for paperwork showing a makers serial number , there was none . Oddly enough , we could not even find an Accucraft logo on the loco itself either .
This raises the interesting point , were the first ones to a different design ? Different motors , different gearing ? Or as my cynical son just suggested , perhaps they made a batch of good ones to encourage the market then relapsed into cheaper motors or something ? That
is not as daft as it sounds , I have seen this happen on a small scale when a demonstrator model is on show at a model railway show (naughty) , it may happen with other stuff .
What makes me give credence to this is I got the first off Accucraft K27 (years back) , and a similar thing happened , people were talking of putting a decent motor in .
The LGB Aster WPYR loco had people up in arms about lousy motors . Our model has no such problems .
I am not saying that all models we buy are acceptable , I have returned models to the manufacturer on a couple of occasions , getting full refunds . These models were returned when , on close examination , it was obvious that there was a design fault that was difficult to overcome .
These were not Accucraft models .
Finally , my experience of Accucraft products from the first one we got (Goose) to the latest
is that they are well worth buying . Perhaps we are lucky .
Mike