Quote:
...Manufacturer's shouldn't announce product if they don't have it...
That's always a quandry. Do you announce a product so that people can plan for it, and hope production goes as scheduled, or hold off, release a $1K locomotive, and hope people have the cash reserves to buy it? It's a delicate game, and quite frankly, none of the manufacturers play it very well. Bachmann went from one extreme to the other, not announcing the Davenport until it was already showing up on store shelves. (I really hope Jack Lynch can shape up their marketing department.) The K-27 debacle, well, it was what it was. Accucraft's famous for sliding delivery dates, and products that "butt in line" so to speak. From a customer standpoint--especially those of us who have written them deposit checks--it's notably frustrating.
Now for rolling stock, I’m not as OC about release dates because the prices aren’t where the locos are. Still, if you announce a release date, you stick with it. Period. You can announce a product that’s “in the pipeline” to generate enthusiasm without being specific about when it may be available. But it should also be advertised as just that–products that are under development for release in the future, not ones that are near to being in production.
As for waiting for lettering schemes, it can be frustrating. My solution–model a railroad for which few products are made. That way, you needn’t worry about what a car is lettered for. Yeah, you have to paint and letter it yourself, but you’d have your passenger cars by now. 
Later,
K