Large Scale Central

545 people

EVERY CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST HAS SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE. READ IT AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT OUR CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.

Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.

*545 PEOPLE
*By Charlie Reese
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ev er wondered why, *if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits,

WHY do we have deficits?*

Have you ever wondered why, *if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do

we have inflation and high taxes?*

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of

Representatives does .

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices

545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible

for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency

to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority.

They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking
thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power

to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist pro mises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to

determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not

their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No

normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the Pres ident

for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress

to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.

Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi

She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can

approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they
agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand

convicted – by present facts – of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single
domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the

plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow

that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red .

If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it’s because they want them in IRAQ.

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people,

it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they

can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give

the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con

you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or

“politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of theOrlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it is up to you, though you appear to have

several choices.

  1. You can send this to everyone in your address book, and hope "they" do something about it.
    
  2. You can agree to "vote against" everyone that is currently in office, knowing that the process 
    

will take several years.

  1. You can decide to "run for office" yourself and agree to do the job properly.
    
  2. Lastly, you can sit back and do nothing, or re-elect the current bunch.

Ken,
A big thumbs up to Charley Reese.
Ralph

He blew it on TWO things…
One: Replacing the 9 justices would be a royal bitch because of the way the constitution set up the judicial branch They are appointed and approved, not elected. It also purposely made them very hard to get rid of to try to reduce the chance of members of the other two branches from trying to influence them by using threat of removal. So even IF we succeeded in voting ALL those other bums out of the two houses and the oval office, we’d STILL pretty much have to wait for those 9 to die off or resign.

And TWO: WHO is responsible for those bums being IN office in the first place? The voters, period. People who WANT all the gimmees (as long as somebody ELSE has to pay for them) People who WANT to be told pretty lies instead of uncomfortable, inconvenient truths. People who WANT somebody else to blame when the shit hits the fan. AND People who MUST WANT all the chaos and stupidity because they keep re-electing the SAME clowns over and over and over. — Or perhaps it is all those people who are too apathetic and lazy to even EXERCISE their right to vote. Think about it, if only HALF the people vote, and HALF of them voted for whomever, then the guy is really only representing the will of ONE QUARTER of the people he serves. Yet ALL of them will bitch about SOMETHING sooner or later.

…which all gives credence to the idea of compulsory voting by electors who have passed an intelligence test.

I think the biggest problem is that the only people who actually LIKE the whole political process enough to run for office, are the very last people who should ever be entrusted with power.

Ray Dunakin said:
I think the biggest problem is that the only people who actually LIKE the whole political process enough to run for office, are the very last people who should ever be entrusted with power.
Nah, the problem is people no longer consider it their DUTY as a citizen to do something to help society. Time WAS that a fellow would take time out from his business to attend the nation's, then go back to his own an with the prestige of being a "elder statesman"..... NOW many, if not most, people look out for THEMSELVES first, last and always... so should we really be all that surprised to find that this ALSO includes our elected officials?

Speaking of elder statesmen.

Would anyone say Colin Powell is NOT an elder statesman?

Term limits.

Money created without debt for constitutionally worthy uses/projects, then “sunk” or “taken out of circulation” by taxes. (Wish I could find that old book…)

Sincerely,

Joe Satnik

TonyWalsham said:
Speaking of elder statesmen.

Would anyone say Colin Powell is NOT an elder statesman?


Well, he is old, I’ll give you that. :stuck_out_tongue: